Veteran opposition figure Kizza Besigye has reportedly declined a behind-the-scenes proposal that would have paved the way for his release on bail, insisting he will not compromise on his legal representation.
According to a source familiar with the discussions, intermediaries approached Besigye with assurances that a bail application could be successfully processed if he agreed to drop prominent lawyers Martha Karua and Erias Lukwago from his defence team.
The proposal, the source said, was framed as a strategic move to ease tensions within the courtroom and improve the chances of a favourable ruling.
The concerns reportedly raised against Lukwago centred on his courtroom style, which some viewed as overly political and confrontational.
He was described as vocal and assertive, with claims that such an approach could alienate judicial officers handling the matter.
On the other hand, Karua—an experienced senior counsel—was said to be perceived as too authoritative, with critics alleging that her strong legal arguments could be seen as undermining the authority of the bench.
The intermediaries are said to have suggested alternative legal representatives, including Ernest Kalibbala and others described as more “civil” in their courtroom conduct.
The implied expectation was that a less combative defence team would create a more conducive environment for the court to grant bail.
However, Besigye reportedly rejected the proposal outright.
“Wait a minute, a bail application can be filed, but I’m not dropping my lawyers,” the source quoted him as saying, signaling a firm stance on both legal principle and personal loyalty.
The development highlights ongoing tensions surrounding high-profile political cases in Uganda, where legal strategy often intersects with broader questions about judicial independence and political influence.
Besigye’s decision suggests a deliberate effort to resist what could be interpreted as external pressure to shape his defence in a particular way.