Pastor and activist Martin Ssempa has weighed in on the controversial abduction of lawyer Erias Lukwago, calling for his immediate release and adherence to due process.
In a public statement issued following Lukwago’s reported detention by military operatives, Ssempa strongly condemned the manner in which the senior lawyer was taken and allegedly held.
He described the situation as unlawful and urged authorities to either formally charge Lukwago or release him without delay.
“Erias Lukwago should be released from the torture chamber. If he has committed a crime, let him be charged in courts of law,” Ssempa stated, emphasizing the need for legal accountability rather than extrajudicial actions.
Lukwago was reportedly abducted from his home in Kampala by armed personnel, with opposition figures accusing security forces linked to Muhoozi Kainerugaba of orchestrating the operation.
His whereabouts remain unclear, although Muhoozi has publicly claimed responsibility for detaining him, sparking widespread criticism.
Ssempa drew parallels with past cases, referencing Okello Oyum, noting that even individuals accused of serious crimes were granted due process under the law.
“Even Okello Oyum was accorded due process. We must be a nation that keeps the rule of law — law of God and man,” he added.
The pastor’s remarks reflect growing concern among religious leaders, legal professionals, and civil society groups over the treatment of opposition figures and lawyers in Uganda.
The Uganda Law Society has already demanded answers regarding Lukwago’s detention, warning that such actions undermine the independence of the legal profession.
Ssempa also revealed that he recently discussed the issue in an interview with NTV Uganda, which is expected to air on Sunday, potentially shedding further light on his position and the broader implications of the incident.
The abduction has intensified debate over governance, human rights, and the role of the military in civilian affairs.
As pressure mounts, attention now turns to whether authorities will respond to calls for transparency and uphold constitutional safeguards.
For now, Lukwago’s case continues to draw regional and international scrutiny, with observers warning that the handling of the matter could have lasting implications for Uganda’s justice system.
