A section of Ugandans on social media has come to the defence of Speaker Anita Annet Among following growing criticism over reports that she recently acquired a Rolls-Royce Cullinan valued at billions of shillings.
The luxury vehicle, estimated to cost about Shs3.4 billion after taxes and import charges, has sparked debate online, with critics questioning how it was financed.
The discussion comes at a time when many Ugandans are grappling with economic hardship, intensifying scrutiny around high-value purchases by public officials.
Amid the backlash, an X user identified as Gladys Nanyanzi has defended the Speaker, arguing that the criticism ignores her status, income streams, and investments.
“People are crying over a supposed Shs3.4 billion Rolls-Royce for Anita Annet Among as if she is some ordinary villager surviving on airtime loans,” she wrote.
Nanyanzi argued that Among’s positions in government and the ruling National Resistance Movement place her among the country’s most influential leaders, with access to significant earnings and opportunities.
She noted that Among serves as Speaker of Parliament, Woman MP for Bukedea District, and the NRM’s Second National Vice Chairperson (Female), roles she said come with substantial benefits and networks.
The X user also pointed to Among’s investments, describing her as a businesswoman involved in multiple projects, including Bukedea Comprehensive School, Bukedea Teaching Hospital, Bukedea Sports Park, and Mama Bukedea FM.
“The woman controls influence, networks, money, and opportunities most Ugandans can’t even imagine,” she added.
Nanyanzi questioned why some Ugandans find it difficult to believe that senior politicians can accumulate wealth through salaries, allowances, and business ventures.
“Why are some people pretending she cannot afford a luxury car? Or is it pain? Jealousy? Political bitterness?” she posed.
She also criticised sections of the media and opposition figures for amplifying the issue, accusing them of quickly linking such acquisitions to misuse of public funds.
Nanyanzi singled out Daily Monitor and opposition leaders such as Bobi Wine, alongside activists like Sarah Bireete, saying they often frame such stories as corruption-related without providing proof.
“Every time successful politicians acquire expensive assets, the usual propaganda media houses… suddenly become ‘forensic auditors’ screaming ‘taxpayers’ money!’” she wrote.
The defence comes as debate continues online, with critics maintaining that public officials must remain transparent and accountable, especially when acquiring high-value assets.
Others argue that personal wealth should not automatically be treated as evidence of wrongdoing.
The Speaker has previously indicated in media reports that the vehicle was a birthday gift, a claim that has further fueled public discussion.