Ronald Amanyire, a senior official at Uganda’s Ministry of Works and Transport who was recently interdicted, has detailed what he describes as years of isolation and pressure linked to his reporting on alleged corruption within government systems.
In a statement issued after his interdiction, Amanyire paints a picture of a difficult working environment marked by mistrust, distancing by colleagues, and limited institutional backing.
He says the experience has tested his resolve and personal life.
“I CHOOSE HOPE IN THE CORRUPTION FIGHT,” he writes, framing his response to the disciplinary action as a continuation of his stance on accountability.
Amanyire, who has been accused by the ministry of misconduct, insubordination, and unauthorized disclosure of official information, maintains that his actions were driven by a desire to expose wrongdoing.
The ministry has also cited alleged breaches of public service communication rules and the sharing of internal documents on social media as part of the grounds for his interdiction.
In his account, he says whistleblowing in the public sector carries heavy personal consequences.
“The fight against corruption is brutal. It isolates you,” he states, adding that even family members and colleagues often pull away from individuals who raise such concerns.
He further alleges that some officials tasked with handling corruption complaints instead exploit the process.
“Officers in institutions mandated to act treat your reports as opportunities for extortion,” he says.
Amanyire also reflects on the emotional strain he says he has endured over the past three years, questioning the impact of his efforts.
“Every morning you wake up questioning whether speaking the truth was worth it,” he writes, describing the work as demanding and risky.
He adds that the process has been marked by long periods without resolution.
“Three years of redundancy. Three years of hoping against hope. Three years of doubting,” he notes, adding that his family has lived with fear over his safety during this period.
According to him, his actions were meant to test whether Uganda’s anti-corruption framework can deliver accountability when challenged from within the system.
He argues that bureaucratic inertia and silence continue to undermine efforts to address corruption.
The Ministry of Works and Transport has maintained that disciplinary procedures are ongoing following his interdiction, citing alleged violations of public service regulations.
